Link to top Back of the Envelope

Blog
Writings About Me Photos
Links

Tuesday, October 19, 2004

Canadians decide not to share their cheap drugs
Old Post: This is not a suprise.

It seems that buying cheap drugs out of Canada may not be an option for much longer (via Instapundit):
More than 30 Canadian internet pharmacies have decided not to accept bulk orders of prescription drugs from US states and municipalities.

...But growing concern in Canada that growing exports to the US could lead to rising prices and shortages north of the border has prompted the Canadian International Pharmacy Association (Cipa), whose members include several of the biggest internet and mail-order drugstores, to act. "We don't want to give Americans the impression that we have unlimited supply for them to tap into on a commercial basis," said David Mackay, the association's executive director. Americans, he added, "can't get everything from Canada. We can't be your complete drugstore".

Prescription drug prices are significantly lower in Canada than the US, because of price controls and bulk buying by the 10 provinces. Individual Americans have crossed the border for years to buy cheap medicines, but the internet and spiralling healthcare costs in the US have led to a wider movement for states and cities to sourcethe drugs they need from Canada. Several states, such as Minnesota and New Hampshire, have set up websites directing residents to approved pharmacies in Canada. Cipa members would continue to service these customers, Mr Mackay said, but would not deal with states such as Illinois and Wisconsin that have proposed turning over their entire supply system to a Canadian internet pharmacy.

As I explained in an earlier post, drugs are expensive to buy because they are expensive to develop. Canada gets them cheaply because they've enacted price controls, but that only works because the high prices in the US subsidize the drug development. Without the money from US sales, the drug companies would not have the money to research new drugs, causing many drug companies to go under, and drug development at those that survived would slow to a crawl. Doc Rampage suggested that we might want to allow drugs from Canada, in the hopes that prices would even out. If I thought it would work, I'd say go for it, but the problem is that Canada has artificial price controls that are more likely to wreck the drug companies than fix the prices. Canada's already shown a preference for poor healthcare over high prices, and I doubt they'll act in the long-term best interest of drug development. It looks like some Canadians are already acting to fix the problem from their perspective, by simply refusing to share what they shouldn't have in the first place.

Is there anything that can be done to lower prices? It's always going to be expensive to develop drugs, and new drugs are necessarily expensive until the patent runs out and anyone can duplicate it. However, some of that cost can be reduced with tort reform and some deregulation. With something like healthcare you don't want a complete free-for-all, but FDA regulation can be excessive. And while it may seem extreme, it may be useful to limit sales of American drugs to Canadian distributors as long as the Canadian government has price controls in effect.

But then, I'm hardly an expert on this sort of thing, and I'd prefer to hear from someone who is.

Update: Speaking of bulk buying and over-regulation, it's arguable that these are the reasons for the flu vaccine shortage this year. Kevin Drum has more.

Update: Weekly Standard makes a convincing case that the flu vaccine shortage is due to the actions of trial lawyers. Also, Doc Rampage responds to my arguments.

Thursday, October 7, 2004

Drugs from Canada
Dr. Bob of The Doctor Is In explains why you can get cheap drugs from Canada:
The reasons for less expensive Canadian drugs are severalfold. Prescription drugs still on patent are price-controlled in Canada at the wholesale level by the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB), which sets the price of all new patented medications. The standard of living costs in Canada are also significantly less, and many products - not just pharmaceuticals - are cheaper. Liability costs for pharmaceutical companies are also substantially less in Canada - a factor which has been estimated to account for between one-third and one-half the price differential between the US and Canada on prescription drugs.

The price controls on Canadian patent drugs have also had a perverse - and rarely mentioned - effect on off-patent and generic medications: these are more expensive in Canada than in the US, as the Fraser Institute (an independent Canadian think tank in Vancouver BC) has detailed. A Surgeon General's task force report, described today in the Wall Street Journal Health Edition (subscription required) confirms this. Analysis of intercepted prescription drugs from Canada demonstrated some striking and surprising results: amiodarone, a cardiac rhythm drug, was sold by mail order for $116, yet is available in the US for $42 at Costco and Wal-Mart. Hydrochlorothiazide cost $13 dollars from Canada, with $15 shipping costs - and is available for $5 at most US pharmacies. Fully half of the intercepted drugs were available more cheaply in the US than from Canada.

Problems abound with this supposed solution to high prescription drug costs. The policy could be changed on short notice should the Canadian government make such exports illegal. Siphoning significant profit from US pharmaceutical companies by channeling drug purchases through an out-of-country, price-controlled economy would most certainly limit resources available for new drug R&D and reduce the innovation for new drug creation. And then there is the problem of quality control and potential fraud.

Joe Carter has more to say (in the post which directed me to Dr. Bob's post) on how bad the idea of importing drugs from Canada is:
Was Edwards kidding when he proposed that a solution to high prescription drug prices was to allow them to be imported from Canada? Doesn't he realize that the drugs are only cheaper in Canada because they have price controls? Obviously, if we allow prescriptions to be imported from another country then our pharmaceutical companies have to send more to that country at the price control rate. What happens when the artificial demand exceeds the supply? Will the Kerry Administration force them to keep shipping the drugs to Canada so that we can have cheap imports? If so, then why not just skip the middle-man and implement price controls ourselves?

As I've explained to some of my friends, Canada only has cheap drugs because we have expensive ones. We subsidize their cheap drugs. What would happen if we no longer did that? At best, prices would have to go up in Canada and it would even out. At worst, the pharmaceutical companies will be crippled, and new drug development will slow to a crawl, since that's what the high price of drugs goes to: the R&D work and the FDA approval process, coupled to the legal risk. If that happens, we may be able to get the currently avaible drugs cheap, but don't look for any more miracle drugs for a while. I suppose we could hope for socialized drug development, with the government propping up the drug companies, but I do my best not to hope for any form of socialized medicine. If that worked well, Canada wouldn't need us subsidizing their cheap drugs.

New Post: Canadian drug distributors move pre-emptively to prevent shortages, above.