More Potter?
Spoiler alert! There are spoilers to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in this post, including to some of what appears in the epilogue, but they really aren't too bad.
Over at the Corner, John Podhoretz believes that J.K. Rowling will be writing a new Harry Potter book sometime in the future. Although that may be a bit misleading--his contention is that she'll write another book in the same world, even if it's not actually about Harry. John Hood suggests it may be a prequel. I'm not so sure about that. A large part of Harry Potter has been the revelations from the past, the truth about the years when James, Lily, Sirius, and Snape were in school, and about when Hagrid and Tom Riddle were in school, and even about Dumbledore's misspent youth. The bottom line is that, even if there are still a lot of blanks, we have a lot of information about the pasts of all the significant characters. There's just not much need for a prequel. If there is one, I'd rather have Lily's or Snape's perspective, rather than, say, James's or Sirius's. And the period between their Hogwarts years and Voldemort's first encounter with Harry would be more interesting than their school years.
Anyway, I think there's a better chance for a sequel than a prequel. The epilogue of Deathly Hallows already introduces us to the likely cast of characters we'd see in it. Of course, there's no clear antagonist there, but that doesn't mean one can't be found. And did anyone else notice that Deathly Hallows takes place in 1997? That nineteen years later in the epilogue lines up with nine years from now, which makes it ten years from the time Rowling would have finished writing Hallows. Ten years is about the time you'd expect it to take before an author returned to their old world... just a thought.
Over at the Corner, John Podhoretz believes that J.K. Rowling will be writing a new Harry Potter book sometime in the future. Although that may be a bit misleading--his contention is that she'll write another book in the same world, even if it's not actually about Harry. John Hood suggests it may be a prequel. I'm not so sure about that. A large part of Harry Potter has been the revelations from the past, the truth about the years when James, Lily, Sirius, and Snape were in school, and about when Hagrid and Tom Riddle were in school, and even about Dumbledore's misspent youth. The bottom line is that, even if there are still a lot of blanks, we have a lot of information about the pasts of all the significant characters. There's just not much need for a prequel. If there is one, I'd rather have Lily's or Snape's perspective, rather than, say, James's or Sirius's. And the period between their Hogwarts years and Voldemort's first encounter with Harry would be more interesting than their school years.
Anyway, I think there's a better chance for a sequel than a prequel. The epilogue of Deathly Hallows already introduces us to the likely cast of characters we'd see in it. Of course, there's no clear antagonist there, but that doesn't mean one can't be found. And did anyone else notice that Deathly Hallows takes place in 1997? That nineteen years later in the epilogue lines up with nine years from now, which makes it ten years from the time Rowling would have finished writing Hallows. Ten years is about the time you'd expect it to take before an author returned to their old world... just a thought.
Related Posts (on one page):
- More Potter?
- Review of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows




