Link to top Back of the Envelope

Blog
Writings About Me Photos
Links
Business Cards
I'm thinking of getting some business cards. Not for work, but for blogging. Of course, by "get," I mean design them with Microsoft Publisher and buy some business card stock and print them out on my color inkjet at home. That's really all that's needed to get business cards these days. In any case, here are a couple of designs I came up with.

First design:


Second design:

What do you think? You notice that they're both based on the new Back of the Envelope logo I now have on my page (if it looks like the old one to you, hit reload to make sure the new image is used rather than the old one you have in your cache). I decided to update it to a better looking envelope with a more quantum computation-specific equation. <0|+>=1/2½ is actually a dot product of two vectors (one-dimensional arrays). If |0> and |1> are the two qubit states zero and one in vector form, then <0| and <1| are their conjugate transposes. (That's just what it sounds like--take the conjugate of the complex numbers and transpose the vector.) Using the usual 0 and 1 basis, we define the vector |0>=[1;0] and |1>=[0;1]. (The semicolons indicate that the elements are in separate rows--it's hard to show here.) Thus, <0|=[1 0] and <1|=[0 1]. <0|0>=1 and <1|1>=1, but <0|1>=0 and <1|0>=0. It's an orthonormal basis set, where each vector has a unit length and is orthogonal to the other vectors in that set, and by multiplying them by scalars you can create any vector in that space. Meanwhile, |+>=1/2½(|0>+|1>) and |->=1/2½(|0>-|1>), forming a separate orthonormal basis set. I've discussed different bases before. The key idea is that while |0> and |1> are orthonormal to one another, as are |+> and |->, |0> and |1> are not orthonormal to |+> amd |->, giving <0|+>=1/2½.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Final version
  2. Business Cards

Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.donaldscrankshaw.com/admin/trackbackdrum.pl?post=1134238750

Listed below are links to blogs or other websites which have notified this blog that they've posted something which links to Business Cards. This is an automatically generated list and the presence of any link on this list should not be construed as an endorsement of them.


Tom Harrison (www):
I like the first one.

This is an idea I may imitate.
12.10.2005 3:02pm
Kim (mail) (www):
I love the top card! I love the whole idea, actually. I do have to admit that my eyes glazed over at the description of the envelope logo : )
12.10.2005 4:30pm
Doc Rampage (mail) (www):
Yeah, I've been planning to do this for ages, but never got around to it.

Hey, where can I get a membership card for the VRWC?

I like the first design better.
12.10.2005 6:20pm
Donald S. Crankshaw (mail) (www):
Well, I used the date I signed up for the Blogs for Bush as my start date in the VRWC, but if you really want a card, you can check this out. I'm not sure they're still doing it, though.

I like both designs, although I agree that the first probably looks the best. The second tries too hard to be clever. It does look better if you add a black border, but that's almost impossible to print out right--yeah, I've printed a few of each on my printer. Because it's so hard to get the alignment just right, I design it a little bit bigger than the actual card size and let it spill over onto the extra space. I'm using this card stock, basically a page of cards which snap out. Works pretty well, and as the ad promises, they don't have annoying perforated edges.
12.10.2005 8:07pm
Anika Cole:
Donald,

I like the top design! I'll be honest though, I can't stand inkjet cards. I order my cards online and have had excellent results with these business cards. I upload my own design and they come back to me better than any inkjet could do.

If you are only handing out a few, then I understand your decision to use an inkjet but you should give that site a look... they accept publisher files.

Happy holidays!
12.13.2005 9:58pm
Donald S. Crankshaw (mail) (www):
Thanks for the advice, Anika, although I thought the inkjet cards I printed out looked great. If I wanted a large number, I'd probably try something like the online company you mentioned--no matter how good they look, they're a lot of trouble to print--but I think what I have works well for my purposes.
12.13.2005 10:04pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?
I must approve every post before it goes up. I do not do this in order to prevent people from disagreeing with me, but merely as a way to control the comment spam. I typically let my readers say whatever they want, even if they want to insult me. I will edit out any pornography or profanity, though.