Link to top Back of the Envelope

Blog
Writings About Me Photos
Links

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Network Drive Fine Tuning
I spent a couple of hours yesterday trying to speed up my network drive's connection with my laptop. Here's what I've tried:
  1. Changing the Wireless encryption.
  2. Turning off Wireless encryption.
  3. Turning off the Firewall.
  4. Toggling protected mode (which is supposed to monitor for 802.11b interference, of which there's plenty around here).
  5. 125 High Speed turbo mode
  6. Frame Bursting turbo mode.
  7. No turbo mode.
  8. Different channels.
  9. Wireless G only mode.
  10. Turning off my anti-virus's resident shield.
  11. Turning off my spysweeper software.

As far as I can tell, the max throughput I can get is 24 Mbps. On Sunday, I said I was getting 25 Mbps, but that was a slight exaggeration, as I was only getting about 20 Mbps with any regularity. By turning off encryption, my antivirus software, my spy sweeper software, and leaving on Frame Bursting and the Firewall and leaving off protected mode, on a channel separated by five from the other G networks around here, I pushed it to 24 Mbps. However, I ultimately decided to compromise on the Encryption, using 128-bit WEP at a cost of 6% speed and getting 22.5 Mbps. (WPA-PSK, which I had been using before, would have cost me another 6% and knocked me down to 21 Mbps.) It's still slower than I would have liked, but it is acceptable.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Network Drive Fine Tuning
  2. Weekend Challenges
New Blog
My church has started a blog, Blogma Dogma. It includes posts from the ministers on various topics, mostly theological. It's a cool idea, and I hope to see more blogging from churches.

Monday, January 30, 2006

Storyblogging Carnival XXXVII
Welcome to the thirty-seventh Storyblogging Carnival, a collection of storytelling in blog format from around the blogosphere.

I was a bit worried when Thursday rolled around and I only had I only had three entries, including my own, but my fellow bloggers rallied to my help (which is a euphemism for saying that they gave in to my whining), and we have a total of nine stories this week.


Not Being
by Goemagog of this space for sublet
A 290 word brief story rated G.

I hope Kafka would have liked it.

[With only 144 words, it's hard to say much without giving it away. But it's possibly the most surreal thing Goemagog's ever written, and my new favorite of his. -DSC]


Dr. Tundra Forsakes the Flying Spaghetti Monster
by Mark Rayner of The Skwib
A 450 word brief story rated PG-13.

This is a humorous sequal to the alternate history tale Dr. Tundra in the Dock, following the misguided doctor's time in the "Reeducation Retreat". Some sexual content.


Ink Magic (Part 7) (Beginning)
by Dave Gudeman of Doc Rampage
The latest 1,202 words of a 14,538 word short story in progress rated PG.

Our hero learns to use the graviscope to spy on the demonic entities that are spying on him.

[Ooh, old computers and odd devices are always fun. Plus there's a really freaky revelation. -DSC]


Rampage in a Spa
by Dave Gudeman of Doc Rampage
A 1,963 word short story rated PG-13.

James Frey set the standard; all I did was follow it in this poignant and rivetting but completely emotionally true account of my first (and probably last) visit to a hot-springs spa with a companion who was not entirely of my own choice.

[This story rocked! It was funny and ridiculous and completely true, emotionally. It continues Doc's series on his adventures in Morocco. -DSC]


Benoni , Part One
by Adam Graham of Adam's Blog
A 2,234 word short story rated PG.

A man plunges into despair and bitterness after September 11th. Two years, as his wife lays on an operating table, he must come to terms with his feelings and faith.

[This time it's Adam, not Andrea, who's sharing a story at Adam's Blog. It's a different story, and quite powerful. -DSC]


A Sad Tale from Skuddledump
by Lyn Perry of Bloggin' Outloud
An 2,630 word short story rated G.

A retelling of the Garden of Eden.

[This is a delightful story, the Garden of Eden as a modern high rise apartment building. I liked it. -DSC]


Part 3, Chapters 14 and 15 of The Child (Beginning)
by Sheya Joie of Tales by Sheya
The latest 4,385 words of a 117,858 word novel in progress rated PG-13.

During the report at the end of their second day of scouting in the enemy's fortress, Stone recounts a very eventful day - explaining his nasty shiner among other things - as well as shedding just a touch of murky light on his own dark past in this deepest dungeon.


Verdict, Chapter 16 of Fire (The Whole Thing)
by Donald S. Crankshaw of Back of the Envelope
A 5,494 word excerpt of a 90,110 word novel.

After Victor's testimony, the Order's Senate passes judgement on the Dominus Aulus.


Chapters 21 and 22 of Britannia Revived (The Whole Story)
by Andrew Ian Dodge of Dodgeblogium
The next 7,794 words of a continuing story rated R.

The story of an EU dystopia continues.


If you'd like to take part in a future carnival, please contact me. I am also looking for hosts. Other carnivals can be found here.

The Storyblogging Carnival can be found at The Truth Laid Bear's ÜberCarnival.
Weekly Webcomic Update
Sluggy Freelance — When Lady Noga attacks, Calix, Kada, and BA manage to escape, leaving behind the pirates and leaf people who tried to kill them. Those end up running out of time and succumbing to the long grey, at least until John Jacobs captures the Greys but leaves behing the rest.

Day by Day — Al Gore's global warming,Campaign Finance Reform, Fertik calling for blackmail, Google's Communist collaboration, Michael Yon, and John Murtha all get some play time this week, all in a dialogue between Damon and Jan.

Scary Go Round — Milford realizes his complete lack of musical ability might impede his hopes to start a rock band, so he comes up with an alternative: 'synth pop.' Meanwhile, Lindsay tosses Black Esther out of her band for poor singing, and instead hires Roxy, whose become sufficiently dark in her hypnotized state to pass for a Goth--with really blond hair.

College Roomies from Hell!!! — The Roomies somehow manage to board the plane, despite having implanted devices and being on terrorist watch lists and being armed to the teeth (well, Margaret says she's unarmed, but I don't believe it).

General Protection Fault — UGA's been spying on Nick, which is how they discover that a false Ki visited him the night before the wedding. They also guess that he's been kidnapped via the Mutex, which is supposed to be a VR simulator but actually bridges worlds. Meanwhile, our world's Trudy shows up, and we visit Evil Nick and Ki, who are holding Good Nick captive. How come Nick always winds up getting kidnapped?

Schlock Mercenary — On their way to deliver the giant squid, Tagon assigns crew quarters, but has to keep them all together to save space while keeping them from realizing exactly how spacious the ship is.

Sunday, January 29, 2006

Weekend Challenges
I didn't get much done this past weekend. It wasn't that I was lazy, just distracted. I decided to upgrade my network. I have a laptop and a desktop--the desktop is four years old, the laptop is two. I've upgraded the desktop--memory, video card, even processor--so it isn't as pathetic as its age suggests. However, both of them only have 40 GB hard drives, and I decided if I'm going to start putting videos on my iPod, I really need more space. (My iPod has 30 GB of memory, remember.) So I bought a Netgear SC101 Network Storage Device and two hard drives: one at 250 GB and one at 200 GB hard drives. The reason for that discrepancy is that I'm using 50 GB on one drive to back up the important files on both my computers (using the automatic backup software that came with the device), while I'm using the remaining 200 GB for storage of music, videos, and pictures--the space consuming portion of anybody's library. The other 200 GB disk drive mirrors the 200 GB partition on the first one. Thus I have two copies of everything, and I no longer have to rely on my sporadic manual copying in the case of a catastrophic hard drive failure.

My main concern with using network drives like this is whether they're fast enough. With my desktop, which has a 100 Mbps network card, I get a maximum transfer rate between the computer and the drive at 50 Mbps, which is reasonable. (It's only about half that when I write to, but not when I read from, the mirrored 200 GB.) For my laptop, well... in the course of this, I decided that I really needed to upgrade my wireless from a 802.11b to 802.11g network if I wanted to take advantage of this drive, so I did. It's definitely faster, but it doesn't quite live up to its potential, maxing out at a 25 Mbps transfer rate between the network drive and the laptop. I had hoped it could manage 50 Mbps. (Initially, I was getting a pathetic 5 Mbps, but I switched off the "125 High Speed Mode" on my Belkin Router, as that was, instead of increasing my wireless card's speed, preventing me from getting much throughput on the only application I needed it for.) In any case, the current performance is acceptable, but I'd dearly love to learn how to increase its speed by a multiple of two, especially from the laptop.

Incidentally, all this shopping hasn't set me back as much as you might think. Between a couple of rebates and coupons, most of which I didn't know about when I made the purchaces, I saved $110. That's a decent discount for over $400 worth of purchases.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Network Drive Fine Tuning
  2. Weekend Challenges

Friday, January 27, 2006

Quantum Sense
I've been bouncing around an idea in my head of starting up a second blog, a group blog devoted entirely to Quantum Computation. The idea would be to despin the quantum news in order to help the layman understand the true state of progress without trying to convince people that every incremental step is the next revolution in computing. It would also help readers keep up withthe real news in quantum computation, looking at important advances which appear in the scientific journals but which lack the proper PR department to impress the MSM.

The problem is, aside from my lack of time to take on yet another project, the fact that I lack the expertise to effectively do this. I am, as I have said in the past, not a physicist, theoretical or otherwise, but an engineer who has done experimental physics, and I'm not even in the field of quantum computation anymore. Thus the need for this to be a group blog, where my role would primarily be Token Engineer and Substitute Layman, trying to get the real experts to explain it in terms the rest of us can understand. Of course, to really do this, I would need to recruit real Quantum Computation experts, of whom I know a couple. I'm not sure they'd be interested--some of them are bloggers, but they may rather write their own blogs than participate in a group one. If one of them were doing the job, I could just link to them and not worry about it, but some prefer to use their blogs for non-technical things, while others are way too technical, and most of them are not very regular bloggers. We'll see.
God or Not Carnival thoughts: Sola Scriptura
God blogger Mathetes argued in his contribution to the last God or Not Carnival that sola scriptura was illogical:
A question that has always been at the forefront of all of my endeavors with sola scriptura or, strictly text-based religions, (i.e. religions that take their meaning, truth, guidance and importance from scripture; religions like Judaism, Islam and protestant Christianity) is the problem of interpretation. The problem, as it pertains to Islam and protestant Christianity, goes something like this:

1.There are many interpretations of the Qur’an/Bible
2.Islam and protestant Christianity claim to be absolutely true (in most cases)
3.Therefore one interpretation of the Qur’an/Bible is the correct interpretation
4.There is no authority under either Islam or protestant Christianity that tells which interpretation is correct.
5.Therefore the Absolute truth claims of Islam or Christianity are either
a. false, because they are wrong
b. irrelevant, because the correct interpretation under the presuppositions of the two positions is impossible to be known leaving us skeptics.

This is most certainly a big question for Muslims and protestant Christians alike. If they do not have a correct interpretation of the Qur’an/bible, they don’t have truth. How would a protestant Christian or a Muslim go about finding an answer to this? I hope to be able to show what resources, faculties and thoughts both Muslims and Christians might begin to use to examine this argument.

I believe that this is an incorrect interpretation of what sola scriptura means. From, of all things, the Wikipedia definition:
Sola scriptura reverses the order of the Church's authority, as it is understood in the Catholic tradition: Instead of the Catholic Church's teaching authority being the interpreter of Scripture, sola scriptura makes Scripture the interpreter of tradition. For this reason, it is called the formal cause of the Reformation.

Sola scriptura did not originally signify a radical rejection of all authority of the Church to interpret the Scriptures, but rather represented a claim that the teaching authority of the Church is regulated by the Bible, constrained by Scripture in both a limiting and a directing sense. As John Wesley stated in the 18th century, "The Church is to be judged by the Scriptures, not the Scriptures by the Church." The Reformers argued that the Scriptures are guaranteed to remain true to their divine source, and thus, only insofar as the Church retains scriptural faith is it assured of all the promises of God.

Sola scriptura holds that the Bible is the most reliable source of authority on the Christian faith. It is not, however, the only source of authority.

If I believed that the tradition of the Church (not referring narrowly to the Catholic Church, but to the broad family of believers throughout history), other historical sources, archeology, and reason had no authority, then indeed I would be hard pressed to find a non-circular reason to believe in the Bible's authority. However, these things do have authority, and even though none of them have the same authority as the Bible themselves, they do affirm its greater authority. You may wonder how a greater authority can be derived from lesser ones. It is basic inductive logic, the same as is used in science all the time. No particular experiment has any great authority, but the sum of them allows us to derive the scientific laws which have great authority.

The same principle is used in interpreting scripture. While none of these things are the ultimate authority in interpreting scripture, they each can contribute to our understanding. The ultimate authority in scriptural interpretation, though, is the Holy Spirit. We believe that the Spirit works to teach us truth when we study the Word of God with humility. But what should we make of the wildly different conclusions reached by Christians about various theological points, such as free will and predestination? I would argue, and I think most Evangelicals feel this way, that those points of contention which Christians have argued over for hundreds of years may not be as important as we think they are. Our specific beliefs about the details are a lot less important than an active faith that lives out the clear teachings of Jesus.

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Canada
So apparently Canada just had an election. I know, you probably didn't notice either. They selected a minority Conservative government. Of course, in Canada, a minority government indicates not that they lost, but that they won a plurality of the seats in the Parliament, but not a majority. As I understand things, Canada has four main parties: the Tories (or Conservative party), the Liberals, the NDP, and the Bloc. The Liberals are to the left of US Democrats, and have been in power for decades, such that they've shaped the policies and institutions definitively. The NDP are even more to the left, while the Bloc represents those in Quebec who want to be even more independent--I'm not sure whether they're outright secessionist or not, but they're close. That leaves the Conservatives, who now have the plurality and can name Harper as their Prime Minister. What does that mean for Canadian politics? Well, I certainly have no idea, but Mark Steyn explains that Canadians don't mean the same thing by "conservative" as Americans do:
As I said, Scary Stephen's no Ron [Reagan] or Maggie [Thatcher]. But as a young man in the '80s he was spurred into politics by his clear understanding - unlike most so-called Canadian "conservatives" - that his country had missed out on Thatcher-Reagan economic liberalisation. Essentially, he's a political economist with a libertarian streak: he thinks that if you leave taxpayers with more of their money they're more likely to spend it in ways that do more social good than letting the government disburse it.

And here's where I think Harper could prove Howardesque. He shares two of the Australian Prime Minister's great qualities: he's very secure in his sense of himself, and he has a very shrewd sense of what's politically possible. If he plays those cards right - and I'd bet he will - he could be, as Howard has been, one of those unflamboyantly transformative leaders who leaves the political landscape significantly altered.

They may be able to insert a bit of conservatism into Canadian politics, but their brand of conservatism makes Bush look far right.
Laziness...
I was feeling intolerably lazy last night. All I wanted to do was go to sleep, despite the fact that I needed to revise Eyes of the Shadow, and I also wanted to write about sola scriptura. I'm afraid I didn't get much blogging done for today.

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Verdict, Chapter 16 of Fire
The Rest of the Story: The whole of Fire can be found on my Writings page in PDF format, while the portion of the story that's been published on this blog so far is on this page.

This chapter had a lot of interesting stuff, and I learned a lot about how the Domini operated. Most importantly, it moved the story forward in a lot of ways--more on that later. For now, here's Chapter 16 of Fire.


Chapter 16
Verdict

"Yes."

While a ripple ran through the watching Domini, both Senators and observers, Randall just breathed a sigh of relief. For a moment, he had thought that Victor would not go through with it. Kulsin was smiling now, ready for the kill. "Tell me about it," he said as the murmuring died down.

That Victor did, reluctantly, the words being dragged out of him by Kulsin's probing questions. Victor avoided meeting Kulsin's or Aulus's eyes, mostly looking at the floor. The tale he told, of meeting with Aulus several times a month over the last two years before he came here, of learning the basics of Essence and Circuits, was believable and convincing. He kept his story simple, only filling in details as Kulsin prompted him. If Randall had not known about Aulus's message to his nephew, he would have believed the story.

Kulsin fought hard not to grin, but Randall could see the triumph in his eyes. "Tell me, Victor, did Aulus ever have any contac' with your sister?"

For the first time, Victor raised his head, eyes darting between Randall, Kulsin, and Aulus. Despite his obvious uncertainty, it took him only a moment to answer "No."

"Are you certain?" Kulsin pressed.

"I'm certain that I don't know anything about it." Victor looked at Aulus openly now, a real question in his gaze. Aulus gave no sign that Randall could see.

"Did she know about your meetin's with Aulus? Did you tell her about them, teach her anythin'?" Kulsin was shooting blind now. Randall relaxed a bit, but Victor seemed even more wary.

"No, nothing. I didn't tell anyone about my uncle. What does Lucia have to do with this?" He then belatedly added, "If I may ask."

"Lucia is dead."

"What? Dead? How--?" Victor's voice cracked, halting his sudden rush of words. His face had lost color and expression.

"Lucia was killed by magic, probably her own. A Dominus went to speak to her about Aulus. We don't know what happen' between them, but some spark of uncontrolled magic started an unnatural fire that killed both of them. No one else was harm'." Victor's mouth moved, but Randall could not hear any sound which he may have made. Kulsin didn't wait for him to speak anyway. "Whatever happen' is the fault of the one who taught her so poorly. If you know anythin', you should tell us now and brin' that man to justice."

Kulsin's bulging eyes were fixed on his witness's, who just stared straight through him. The Kairnin at least had the grace not to point at Aulus as he invited Victor to name Lucia's murderer. The young man was firmly caught in Kulsin's trap, and Randall expected him to break down and tell Kulsin what he wanted to hear. In the end, truth won out, an odd victory considering that Victor had been lying only a moment ago. "I don't know of anything between Aulus and Lucia," the Acolyte said slowly. "I'd tell you if I did." Randall believed that.

Kulsin kept his eyes focused on his prey's a moment longer, then turned to the presiding Dominus. "I have no more questions for him."

"Very well," Marton, who ran the Senate this year, replied without standing. "Does the Accused have any questions?"

Aulus stood. "I believe the boy has suffered enough. I won't add to his misery."

"The witness may go then," Marton said. "Randall, will you take the Acolyte Victor to his quarters?"

Randall rose and went to Victor. Taking hold of his arm, he steered Victor out of the chamber. As soon as they were past the door, the boy came to a stop. "Is it true?" Victor asked. "Is Lucia dead?"

Randall glanced around. With the trial in session, no people wandered the hall, but even an empty public hallway was too exposed. He placed a finger to his lips, then led Victor down a side corridor, then another, then a third that ended in a blank wall. No doors led off the narrow, dead-end passageway. Aulus wrapped a protective sphere around them both to keep their voices from traveling.

"What's going on?" Victor asked, angry and grieving.

"Kulsin thinks your sister is dead. Aulus believes otherwise."

"What do you think?"

"I think that it is very important for Kulsin to believe Lucia is dead. I think he would kill her if he found her alive."

"So she is alive," Victor said, wiping damp eyes with his red sleeve. He took a slow breath. "What happened? Is she all right? Where is she?"

Randall lay his hand on the boy's shoulder, "I never said she was alive, and I will truthfully deny using that particular phrase if you tell anyone that I have." His eyes flicked back down the hallway, "I suggest you don't do that. Kulsin didn't send that Dominus to just talk with your sister. And I cannot tell you any more than that without putting you at risk."

"I don't care about that," Victor snapped.

"I do," Randall said calmly enough, considering the strain he felt. If this boy didn't keep quiet, he could destroy not just himself and Aulus, but Randall as well. "Aulus thought enough of you to risk himself for your sake. I'm not going to let your recklessness throw that away. Is that perfectly understood?"

Victor ignored the question, instead looking in the direction of the Senate chamber. "I've doomed him, haven't I?"

"No, you haven't. It was his choice."

Victor shook his head. "No, it was mine. He asked me to do it, which may make his actions noble and honorable. That does nothing to justify mine."

Randall had nothing to say in response to that.

After escorting Victor to the large wooden gates that marked the border between the Inner and Outer cities, Randall made his way back to the Senate Amphitheater. He slipped in quietly through a side door so that he would not disturb the proceedings, but the care seemed unnecessary, as the entrance of a Novar army would not have drawn attention away from the drama taking place on the floor. Aulus and Kulsin were both standing, red-faced and engaged in a shouting match. At the moment, Kulsin was drowning out Aulus. "Your disregard for the laws of the Domini have hurt us in the eyes of the world, not helped. It is your fault that we are unwelcome in Quian, forbidden from even enterin' Manuel's capital."

"My fault?" Aulus's voice rose to an even greater volume. "Quian hates us because you murdered dozens of innocents."

"I destroyed a Necromantic cult. There were no innocents there, no matter how youn' they were. You're the one who brought outsiders into the Order's affairs. They should never have witness' what we did there."

Aulus trembled with anger. Randall, taking his seat near the front of the Senate, thought for a moment that the Novar would launch himself bodily at Kulsin. When he spoke, however, his voice had returned to its normal tone. "This isn't about me, Kulsin. You know that and I know that."

Randall should have recognized it as a bad sign when Kulsin just let him speak. "This is about the Order. You and I each hate what the other represents. You want the Domini to remain the same, unchanged after seven hundred years. I believe the time has come for us to change. Whatever laws I have broken, I've only harmed the Order if you see any evolution as harmful."

Aulus began to move now, pacing back and forth. Kulsin stepped out of his way. Looking around, Randall could see the nearby Senators following Aulus with their eyes, hanging on his words. "We have decided that the way we are is the only way we can be. The only way we can perform our function. Thus we will Expel any one of us who threatens to change that, by teaching our skills to someone else, by telling an outsider about our affairs, by loving a woman. These things don't harm our Order, they help it. They make us part of humanity again, allowing us to identify with those we're supposed to be helping, actually doing something for them rather than watching from the shadows. What have we done to help the human race recently? In what way have we improved the lot of a single person? We don't feed the starving, we don't heal the sick, we don't educate the ignorant. The Philosophers may look down on the rest of the world, but at least they're not afraid to go out into it. Thousands have benefited from their knowledge and skill, as expensive as it is. Name one human being who is better off because we exist. We are so intent on protecting them from mythical enemies that we can't be bothered to care about the people we're protecting."

"And what of these enemies, Domine? What can you tell us about them?" Kulsin spoke softly, but he nearly bounced on his toes in excitement. Be careful, Aulus, Randall thought, certain that Aulus must see the insane look in the Kairnin's wide eyes.

His thoughts went unheeded. Aulus had been planning this speech for a long time, and he gave no indication he even heard Kulsin, though his next words addressed the question. "And what enemies are we supposed to be defending humanity against? No inhuman army has moved against any human state in centuries. Orcs, Kawyr, the mythical Malwer, all seem content to stay where they are." Aulus came to a stop in his pacing, near where he had started. "Humanity doesn't fear any of them as much as they fear us."

Kulsin stepped forward then, his smile revealing his victory more loudly than his words. "Aulus wants us to forsake our mission, abandonin' our defense of humanity in order to befrien' them. There's a reason why nations have professional armies. Even the Novar citizen soldier is more ideal than reality. The men who guard the welfare of nations need to be harder, stronger, better train' than those they guard. They need a ruthlessness, a willingness to kill and to die that would be dangerous amon' the citizenry. We are the soldiers of humanity. Aulus wants us to become soft and weak so that the world will like us. They don' need to like us, and only selfishness would make us think that it's more importan' than protectin' them. The greates' love we can show for our people is to not seek their love at the expense of their welfare.

"Yes, yes, Aulus will argue that we are not helpin' their welfare. We watch and wait for a threat that will never come. The time for waitin' has passed. This mornin', I received the news that the Orcish horde has return'." This morning? Kulsin had to have known for days. Randall vividly remembered how Kulsin had put off the trial for nearly a month, suddenly agreeing to this date only five days ago. That's when he must have received the news, somehow keeping it secret until now. "The Dominus bearin' this news has jus' arrived."

Nathan, a long-time ally of Kulsin, entered from a side chamber. Aulus didn't wait for his report before he spoke sharply, "How long have you known about this, Kulsin? It's just a little too convenient that you share this news now." So Aulus saw through the Kairnin's deception as well.

"Do you think I would hide somethin' this important from the Senate? If you're goin' to sugges' that, at least make a clear accusation. As I said, Nathan just arrived this mornin', an' he came to me so I could presen' him to the Senate. I admit I intended to wait for the en' of this trial so we could focus our full attention on his news, but it seems that it is relevan' to the trial as well."

"If the Orcs have returned, then it is more important than this mockery of a trial. Let Nathan speak." Aulus resumed his seat. Marton gestured for Nathan to speak as soon as he had done so.

The newly arrived Dominus went to the center of the floor and faced the assembled crowd. He looked tired and dirty, although his travails had left no mark on his robe. He waited for Kulsin's nod before speaking. "Two months ago, Dominus Kulsin asked a number of us to accompany the Novar army headed to the Austral Pass. Their commander, Proconsul Aurelius, believed that the Kawyr were planning an offensive, and he intended to seal the Pass in order to prevent it. Our agents had heard of this, and Kulsin thought it best that we go along in case the threat turned out to be real. Once we arrived at the pass, a patrol went through to investigate further. One of our own, Danil, went with them.

"While they were away, a Kawyr raid attacked the Novar fort, a very specific raid which targeted our means of communication, both mundane pigeons and more magical means." Nathan drew a Speaking Glass from around his neck and showed it to the audience. Something had shattered the half-orb.

"We learned why when the remnant of our patrol returned. They had encountered Orcs on their patrol, thousands of them, accompanied by dozens of warlocks. Fully half their men had died in the flight, Danil among them. The Orcish horde was heading for the pass. They didn't know the exact number, but they had discovered a cache with enough supplies for twenty thousand. Sosto, who led our expedition, ordered me to report to the Senate as quickly as possible. I came by the nearest Doorway, in Martia, to arrive here today, twelve days after I left the Austral Pass."

The assembled Domini had remained quiet during Nathan's speech. Now loud voices stirred among them, demanding action, asking questions, creating utter confusion. Kulsin walked to the middle of the floor beside Nathan, raising his hand for silence, which he got. "Now, Aulus, do you see that there is indeed a threat against humanity that we alone can face?"

Aulus stood. "I see. I see that you have taken advantage of this disaster to get your way. You kept critical information from us so you could use it for political advantage." Shouts and jeers rose from the assembled Domini, aimed at Aulus. Even Senators were shouting at him, some of them among those whom Aulus had counted as allies.

"What would you have us do, then? Nothin'?"

"No, we should do what is right. Here and now, that means fighting this enemy. However, we must not use it as an excuse to undo whatever small progress our Order has made in the past few centuries." They were fine words, Randall thought, but hopeless. Randall knew it, Kulsin had known it from the beginning, and even Aulus must know it by now.

Kulsin turned to face Marton, a light in his bulging eyes. "This trial is no longer the most important issue facing the Senate. I move for an immediate vote on Aulus's guilt or innocence. The issue is not whether he broke our laws: he's admitted as much. He merely argues that his lawbreakin' is somehow justified because there is nothin' to defen' agains'." He didn't need to state his opinion of that argument.

Aulus looked to the dais. "Kulsin is right, there is nothing more to debate. He believes that defending humanity, whatever it takes, is more important than caring about it. I believe in helping people, and yes, that means defending them, but it also means sharing our knowledge and our skills. We cannot serve them by destroying what is human about ourselves."

Marton said, "The advocates have spoken. We will now take the vote."

Randall's initial assessment had been right: Kulsin had already won.



The vote had been close, but enough of Aulus's support had evaporated with the return of the Orcs that Kulsin got the two-thirds necessary for a guilty verdict. For Aulus's crimes, the only possible punishment was Expulsion from the Order. Two guards escorted the convicted Dominus from the chamber. A moment later a hush settled on the amphitheater as the significance of what had happened began to sink in. The Domini did not Expel their own every day, or even every year. No Senator had received that sentence for at least a century, and never one as admired and respected as Aulus. Kulsin did not allow the moment to last, moving to claim the floor immediately. "Fellow Domini, we all feel the tragedy involved in judgin' one of our own, but the business of our Order must go on. The Orcs will not give us a chance to grieve."

Randall didn't wait for Kulsin to whip the crowd into a frenzy. Even Domini could be manipulated by a man like him. Certain that no one would miss him, he slipped out through the same side door by which he had entered earlier.

Leaving the Amphitheater, he headed in the direction of the prison. The trial and the subsequent news had lured everyone but himself out of the streets. Despite the mild weather--the weather was always mild on the island--the warm sunlight on his black robes caused him to sweat. Or that may have come the shame and fearfulness he associated with his upcoming interview. He avoided thinking about that by focusing on navigating the streets. Usually the eclectic collection of buildings both amused and impressed him. The Amphitheater, where the Senate met, and the Basilica, where much of the daily work of the Domini took place, matched the Novar model, with graceful columns and domes. The Library was invisible, its five floors burrowed beneath the Basilica. The Dormitories, where most of the younger Domini lived, had the utilitarian, brick design of the monasteries inhabited by the Manuelite priests. More common than the public buildings were the private homes. The Domini who had built them came from all over the world, so the buildings looked like they had been lifted directly from the four corners of the earth and transplanted here. From quaint Manuelite cottages to Novar villas, from squat Kairnin houses to turnip-domed minarets from the Sovereign Cities, the Domini had brought to life dwellings both familiar and envied in their childhood. Since the land allotted for each building had decreased with time, the larger buildings were invariably older. Particularly disconcerting was the weather-worn, deliberately simple cottage which dwarfed the newly-erected miniature palace which stood next to it. Even in the midst of all this confusion, the Order's prison drew the eye.

The smallest building in the Inner City, it had a single story built of black granite blocks. The heavy wooden doors had a similar color, not painted but hewn from some rock-hard, dark wood which had lasted for centuries. The building had only four small cells, each with a high window too narrow for a man to fit through. The Domini had never intended that their prison hold anyone for more than a few days, since they did not use incarceration as a form of punishment. While indiscretions might earn a mere censure from the Senate, all true crimes merited Expulsion. That lacked even a hair's difference from a death sentence, since the Domini hunted down and killed Renegades. Even the condemned received a chance to contemplate their crimes, so the Order always waited three days before carrying out their sentence. After that time, all Domini had the duty to kill the Renegade on sight. If the Domini seized the Renegade before then, he would be imprisoned here. Holding a magic-wielding Renegade for even a few days required something extraordinary. Eight simple obsidian pillars, no more than narrow cylinders, surrounded the structure. No Essence entered the perfect octagon marked as much by the black flagstones which surrounded the prison and formed its floor as by the obelisks. Like the ocean encompassing an island, Essence lapped at the structure without entering.

Still wondering what he would say to Aulus, Randall stepped between the black monoliths. He hesitated as he noticed that the door stood open. He would prefer it if no one knew about his meeting with Aulus. If he could come back later, speak to him through the window of his cell... Then Randall made out the barely visible black-robed form lying on the black flagstones in the shadow of the doorway. He rushed to the side of the fallen Dominus and threw back the hood.

It wasn't Aulus. He did not know whether he felt relieved or dismayed to find Yestal, one of Aulus's guards, lying there. He had the beginnings of a black eye and a knot on his head, but he'd survive. Aulus must have fought his guards physically. Leaving Yestal, Randall circled around the prison to find Jerod lying on his face within the octagon, seemingly unharmed aside from some scrapes. Aulus had neutralized him with magic. Once outside the prison grounds, he would have used a Circuit against Jerod, who had not yet reached the perimeter. Few Domini had the power to drive Essence through the octagon, a feat akin to making a river flow uphill, but the new Renegade did. Randall shook his head at the stupidity of the guards. One of them should have remained outside the octagon while the other escorted the prisoner within. Even if that one couldn't manage the trick of sending a Circuit inside, he could have maintained some advantage. Didn't they know the proper procedure? Then again, Jerod may have stayed outside and only entered once Aulus escaped and headed for the other side. Entering the octagon rather than circling around on the outside was even worse foolishness.

Aulus himself had vanished. Randall hiked up his robes and sprinted in the direction of the runaway's destination, certain that Aulus would be heading for the Hub if he was thinking rationally.

Randall had not gone far before he spotted the Renegade hurrying along one of the main boulevards. The young Senator assumed that the Dominus he had found was Aulus, since the figure had his hood up, an uncommon practice in the Inner City. Randall might have called out to him if he had not seen another Dominus heading in their direction. Instead, he forced himself to slow to a fast walk so he would not draw attention to himself or the fugitive. The stranger passed Aulus without a second look. By the time Randall could no longer see him, another Dominus had appeared. This close to the Hub, people came and went all the time, no matter what happened in the Amphitheater. Randall recognized this second Dominus as Seth, a young man who had only recently donned the black robes. Fortunately, Seth was in too much of a hurry to accost his former instructor, and Randall hoped he would not remember the encounter, lest he mention it to the wrong person. The odd chase nearly drove Randall crazy. He did not dare run or call out to Aulus where others might see. For his part, Aulus didn't slow or look back. More than once, Randall doubted it was even Aulus that he followed, especially when he turned aside instead of entering the Hub.

The oddest building among odd buildings, the Domini had built the Hub out of dozens of small domes connected to a large, central one by hallways like spokes on a wheel. These spokes had different lengths and spacings, and the domes varied in size. Scattered inside these domes, hundreds of Doorways led to towers all around the world. The cavernous central dome was even bigger than it looked, as it extended a whole story beneath the ground, where it held Doorways big enough to transport goods rather than people between major cities. The Domini sometimes called this the Chamber of Winds, as locations around the world tried to equalize pressure and temperature within that one room. Only a powerful Circuit prevented full-blown tempests from erupting. A walkway which circled the dome at ground level gave access to the spokes which connected to the smaller domes. Each of these domes contained a particular domain, a set of Doorways which might be in the same region, or might all be national capitals, or might all trade similar commodities. When distance did not matter, the Order felt free to group its outposts by other criteria.

The Dominus whom Randall followed skirted around the edge of the Hub before walking into the space between two of the outer domes. As far as Randall knew, there was nothing but empty flagstones there. Hoping it was Aulus he followed, he hurried after the black-robed man. A grinding rumble met him as he passed between the two domes. Following the sound around the left side of a third, even smaller dome, he arrived just in time to see his quarry disappear into the ground. Randall paused to stare at the gaping rectangular hole, where stone stairs led downward beneath the pavement. This could not have been here all this time: even in such a secluded area, a large hole in the ground could not go unnoticed.

Randall summoned a small globe of light and went into the darkness. The narrow stairs descended thirty feet before reaching an equally narrow hallway. As he set foot on the grey stone, a sudden blast of freezing wind cut through him. He wrapped his robe tight against the cold and pressed forward. Aside from the seams of the stone blocks, nothing marked the walls of the corridor, no niches, no sconces, no doors or cross-corridors. Beneath the cold wind, it smelled of age and stale air which had only begun to stir. Randall felt certain this hallway had been here centuries before the Domini had built the Hub right on top of it. He had begun to feel the weight of the stone pressing down on him when he reached a large iron door, just recently forced open. The small stone chamber on the other side, a room which must sit directly beneath the center of the Hub, contained nothing except Aulus and the Doorway from which the wind came.

"Aulus!" Randall shouted through chattering teeth. The Renegade turned around to face his friend.

"I hope you haven't come to stop me," Aulus said, speaking loudly to be heard above the wind.

"What are you doing?"

"I'm fleeing, of course. It's either that or face my death with dignity."

"Why shouldn't you choose dignity?" Randall asked. "You did a noble thing back there. Are you going to throw it away by running?"

"Throw what away? I didn't achieve a thing. Kulsin got what he wanted and all that's left for me is to die in disgrace."

A new thought occurred to Randall. He licked his numb lips before voicing it. "You thought you could win, didn't you? I thought you were sacrificing yourself for your nephew, but that's not it at all. You believed that speech of yours would somehow win over the Senate and vindicate you."

"That was too much to hope for, wasn't it?" Aulus said with a rueful smile. "Still, it was all I had."

"Don't do this, Aulus. If you run, you'll be remembered as a Renegade. If you go back now, turn yourself in, your ideals might live on."

"But I won't. I'm not cut out to be a martyr, Randall. For a moment there, I thought I'd have to be, but then I remembered this." He pointed to the Doorway. It opened into a dark room, lit only by the two glowing spheres accompanying the Domini on this side. Randall could make out nothing but a stone floor.

"Where does it lead?"

"To the truth. Do you have any idea how long I searched for this? Until I found it three years ago, I didn't even know for certain that it existed."

"That doesn't tell me anything."

"No, I suppose it doesn't. You know the legends of the Malwer. We call them that instead of demons and think we know something, while we really know almost nothing. Search our libraries long enough and hard enough, however, and you'll find something more, the location of their prison and the Doorway that leads to it."

"You mean this particular Doorway leads to the prison?" More than cold caused Randall to shiver now. "Have you... been there?" He whispered the last two words.

Aulus spoke as if he had heard Randall's whisper above the windstorm. "Not yet. You see, it's is one way. A ward on this side prevents any living creature from coming to the island. You can communicate with someone on the other side, but this Doorway can only send people to the prison. It can't bring them back."

"Why would anyone design it that way?"

"The other end lies in a keep watching over the prison. In the old days, we manned that keep. Any Dominus who went made a lifetime commitment to guard the Malwer. If ever the need arose for reinforcements, the entire Order could travel there in a moment, but anyone who went knew he had no means of retreat back here. And if the Malwer ever captured the Keep, they could not use it to launch an attack on us."

"You intend to go there now. Why? How can this prison help you?"

"I want to see the prison, to discover whether there's any enemy left to fear, or if we've lived for centuries frightened by a myth. If I can return with news that the prison is empty and the enemy dead, maybe we can put aside that fear and change the way we live."

"How can you come back if the Doorway's one way?"

"The prison is somewhere in this world, and I have an idea where. It may take years to find my way back, but I know I can do it. When I return, then I will accept the Order's verdict. Only I'll be able tell them the full truth before they kill me." A fierce smile broke out on Aulus's face, making him seem young despite the grey hair.

Randall had to admire him. He knew Aulus had no intention of accepting the Order's conviction; he still intended to win. "I should try to stop you."

"Thankfully you won't," Aulus said. "Can you reseal the stairway? I knew someone was behind me, so I didn't get a chance on the way in. Just place this Component in the Circuit that controls it." He constructed a simple Component that Randall had no trouble memorizing.

"Good luck, Aulus."

"You too." Without another word, Aulus let his globe of light vanish and stepped through the doorway. A spiral stairway leading upward appeared out of the darkness when Aulus reignited his glowing sphere. When the Renegade had vanished up the stairway, Randall went about the business of eliminating the evidence. He burned the memory from the room, even though he doubted any Dominus would find much: neither he nor Aulus had done much here. Then he headed back to the corridor, closing the iron door behind him. Just before he reached the steps, he heard bells clanging in alarm, signaling the Order's discovery of Aulus's escape.

Once outside he completed the Circuit which closed the opening. The top steps rose, stone grating against stone until they were level with the pavement, just eight parallel flagstones. Randall could no longer see the Circuit. In order to open the staircase again he'd have to place the Component exactly, without reference to the Circuit he was completing. He had never heard of any means to hide a Circuit, and he wondered how, and why, the early Domini had done it. As an added precaution, Randall wiped clean the memories around here as well. Satisfied that no one in the Order would be able to discover where Aulus had gone, he emerged from the maze of the Hub's exterior. Outside, Domini hurried in all directions with their hoods carefully lowered to show faces. He ran into Yestal almost immediately.

"Are you all right?" Randall asked, seeing his ripening black eye.

"Huh? Yeah, I'm fine. The Renegade slammed me into a wall, but I'll live. I'm luckier than Jerod."

"Jerod? What happened to him?"

"Didn't you hear? He's dead."

"Dead?" Randall stopped breathing for a moment. Jerod had been alive when he left him by the prison. He couldn't have misjudged that, could he?

"Yeah. We can't be certain what happened. I was out cold, and there's no Essence near the prison to leave memories, but they've examined the body. It looks like dark magic killed him." Yestal's voice lowered and became thick with his clipped Kairnin accent as he rushed ahead. "Aulus used Necromancy an' tore his soul clean from his body."


This 5,494 word chapter is an excerpt from a 90,110 word novel.

There were lots of interesting things in this chapter. I had to play out the end of Aulus's trial, and then do something with him. In the course of that, I showed a little bit about how the Domini work, introduced the concept of Voids--places which are devoid of the Essence which the Domini use for magic--even though I wasn't using the term yet. I also talked a bit about the Hub, which was a natural outgrowth of the concept of Doorways. Of course most of them would lead back to the Order's city, and placing them all in one building makes travel easier and keeps them more manageable. I'm still a bit uncertain of Aulus's departure to the Malwer's prison. I think it makes sense, but there are some things I intend to do in the revision that will come when I combine Fire and its sequel.

The most interesting thing in this chapter is a casual mention of the Necromantic cult which Kulsin destroyed thirty years ago. I was casting about for some specific point of contention between the two, and the different ways they'd deal with a threat like the Necromancers struck me as a particularly good one. I think I'd already played a bit with the concept of a society counter to the Domini which studied Necromancy, and one of the more interesting aspects of it is that it would have difficulty recruiting boys with the ability, what with the Domini snapping them up and likely noticing if they started to disappear, but the Domini might not even notice if someone started training girls with the ability. That developed into the Necromancers, and when Aulus and Kulsin started to argue over an encounter with them, I knew I had to write about that incident. Which I did.

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

God or Not Carnival thoughts: Cherry-picking
The Evangelical Atheist argues that it's impossible to take the Bible to be partly literal and partly figurative:
If some passages (aside from the “literal figurative passages” previously mentioned) are taken as literal and others are not, one must be able to defend the distinction. When challenged to do so, these people offer a few typical responses. One is to imply that all of the self-contradictory parts are figurative. This is a convenient but baseless argument that works backward from a comfortable conclusion. Another response is to say that some of the miraculous passages are figurative because they couldn’t really have happened the way they’re written. However, which is more absurd: the resurrection or the burning bush? If any of the extraordinary portions are taken as literally true, this argument falls apart.

The main problem with this argument is that it takes an overly simplistic view of the Bible, as if it's a single book written by a single person, rather than a collection of 66 books, many of which, arguably including Genesis, are also collections of stories from different sources. Thus it makes sense to look at each book on its own, for what it claims to be, in order to decide if it's literal or figurative. The gospels claim to be eyewitness accounts of Jesus's life and ministries. They contain repeated refrains that this is either the account of witnesses or painstakingly researched (the end of John and the beginning of Luke, in particular). You may disagree, but if so, you have to conclude that the account is not just figurative, that it is inherently dishonest.

Some books can be taken either way. There can be disagreement over Job, for instance. Its poetic form, with the prologue and epilogue recounting events in Heaven, suggest a figurative account to some, while others see no reason to discount the events, even if they've been rendered into poetic form. The poetic dialogue may summarize the central arguments of a real debate among real people, even if they didn't speak in poetry at the time.

Genesis, if taken to be what the most literal interpretation of Divine Inspiration calls it, is God's description to Moses of his actions in history and relationship with his chosen people up to that moment. Others believe that it is a collection of the oral stories of the Israelites collected by Moses. Taken that way, these stories can be treated individually according to their genres, and the question of figurative or literal meaning dealt with for each story separately, not as a whole.

The creation account of Genesis 1 has some formulas which suggest a figurative meaning. The first three days consist of the creation of the kingdoms: light and dark on the first day, air and water on the second, and earth on the third. The second set of three days concern the creation of the rulers of those kingdoms: the sun and the moon on the fourth, the birds and the fish on the fifth, and animals and man on the sixth. Some Christians find this convincing evidence that the story is not meant literally, while others say that just because it follows a storytelling formula doesn't mean it didn't actually happen that way.

Thus I think the figurative vs. literal interpretation of each book has to be dealt with separately, and is often open for debate.
Outliers in statistical data
Despite my best efforts, I've been having difficulty explaining, in my comments on my previous God or Not Carnival Thoughts post, why outliers make it difficult to see trends in data. Thus, I'll demonstrate by example. The following graph shows the number of murders per 100,000 for each state in the year 2000, and the percentage of the vote that Gore got in each state that year. As you can clearly see, voting for Gore causes more murders per capita.


"Wait a second!" you say. "There doesn't seem to be any pattern."

"But look at that one point, the one where 90% of the voters voted for Gore, and the murder rate is 42 per 100,000. Isn't that striking? See how clear it is!"

"But it's only one point!"

"But look how big it is!"

That's essentially what my argument with Athana has been like. She refers to a study in the Journal of Religion and Society that shows that religion is bad for nations. As proof, it shows the US, with its high rates of abortion, murder, teenage pregnancy, venereal disease, et cetera, versus a whole bunch of other first-world nations, in a graph where religious belief is the x-axis. The problem is, if you remove the US, which is way more religious than the other nations and also has more murders, abortions, teenage pregnancies, et cetera, most of the graphs don't show any discernable pattern. (The exceptions, which look very linear, are abortions, teenage pregnancies, and under 5 mortality, which is sufficient to get an interesting discussion, and also, I think, all symptoms of the same characteristic.) Thus my argument is that the US is too much of an outlier to include, as its differences from other nations is more than just religiosity: it lacks the social welfare programs, is more ethnically and culturally diverse, places higher value on individual freedoms as opposed to community conformity, the list goes on and on... A real trend in a set of data should survive the removal of any single point. If removing one point, or even a couple, eliminates the trend, then it isn't real.

Going back to my plot and its striking outlier: that outlier is Washington, D.C. "Wait a second," you say. "That's not a state." For the purposes of voting and crime statistics it is, which is why I included it. It also has a population higher than Wyoming. "But," you continue, "it's one large urban center, mostly poor and disadvantaged. It's an outlier!" And that, I believe, is my point.

Monday, January 23, 2006

God or Not Carnival coming up
Chris Hallquist will be hosting the next God or Not Carnival on January 30th here at The Uncredible Hallq, on the topic of "The Definition of God." He's doesn't have very many "God" entries right now, so he asked me to post a request. If you'd like to make an entry, please send it to him through submit-at-godornot.com, and include the following:
  • author's name (or handle)
  • position: GOD or NOT?
  • the title of the blog on which it appears
  • the title of the post
  • a short description of the post (one or two sentences)
  • a link directly to the post (permalink)
  • the trackback URL (if different)

For more information, see the website. Entries are due on Friday, January 27th, at 11:59 pm.
Now accepting submissions to Storyblogging Carnival XXXVII
The Storyblogging Carnival is an opportunity for bloggers to share examples of storytelling in blog format, whether they are fiction posted online or something else. If you're curious about what this looks like, have a look at some examples of previous storyblogging carnivals. The next Storyblogging Carnival will be the thirty-seventh, and it will be going up January 30th.

If you'd like to participate, please e-mail your story submissions to me at dscrank-at-alum.mit.edu (or post in my comments), including the following information:
  • Name of your blog
  • URL of your blog
  • Title of the story
  • URL for the blog entry where the story is posted
  • (OPTIONAL) Author's name
  • (OPTIONAL) A suggested rating for adult content (G, PG, PG-13, R)
  • A word count
  • A short blurb describing the story

The post may be of any age, from a week old to years old. The submission deadline is 11:59 PM Eastern time on Saturday, January 28th. More detailed information follows (same as always):
  1. The story or excerpt submitted must be posted on-line as a blog entry, and while fiction is preferred, non-fiction storytelling is acceptable.
  2. The story can be any length, but the Carnival will list them in order of length, from shortest to longest, and include a word count for each one.
  3. You may either send a complete story, a story in progress, or a lengthy excerpt. You should indicate the word count for both the excerpt and the complete story in the submission, and you should say how the reader can find more of the story in the post itself.
  4. If the story spans multiple posts, each post should contain a link to the beginning of the story, and a link to the next post. You may submit the whole story, the first post, or, if you've previously submitted earlier posts to the Carnival, the next post which you have not submitted. Please indicate the length of the entire story, as well as the portion which you are submitting.
  5. The host has sole discretion to decide whether the story will be included or not, or whether to indicate that the story has pornographic or graphically violent content. The ratings for the story will be decided by the host. I expect I'll be pretty lenient on that sort of thing, but I have some limits, and others may draw the line elsewhere. Aside from noting potentially offensive content, while I may say nice things about stories I like, I won't be panning anyone's work. I expect other hosts to be similarly polite.
  6. The story may be the blogger's own or posted with permission, but if it is not his own work he should gain permission from the author before submitting to the Carnival.

If you'd like to be added to the e-mail list, please let me know. Finally, I appreciate folks promoting the carnival on their own blogs, and I'm always looking for bloggers willing to host future carnivals.
Weekly Webcomic Update
Sluggy Freelance — Bun-bun and Blacksoul get into one incredible fight, which ends with both of them going into the Ocean Unmoving, where they're apparently lost forever. Meanwhile, Calix frees those remaining of his people so both they and the pirates hurt him for betrayal. Poor Calix--he's just done his best to do the right thing, and still everyone hates him.

Day by Day — The Alito hearings, Walter Cronkite, computer addicts, Hillary Clinton, conspiracy theories on bin Laden, and Ted Kennedy, all get some play time this week.

Scary Go Round — After Esther and Erin debate the cause of Shelley's weirdness, a Battle of the Bands competition is announced, and Milford intends to win. The fact that he's much better at drawing crude band logos than actually playing an instrument isn't about to deter him.

College Roomies from Hell!!! — After convincing Roger to fix his robotic hand, Mike sets out to convince Dave to come. All it really takes is three women bodily dragging him to the airport.

General Protection Fault — UGA shows up with a guest, and alt-Trudy gives the good guys some advice. Mostly, though, Mr. Darlington is dragging things out, refusing to tell us what's really going on, keeping us guessing about whom UGA brought (I bet it's this world's Trudy).

Schlock Mercenary — Looking for a quick job, the mercenary company decides to capture a giant squid. It's easy work, plus they get paid twice!

Sunday, January 22, 2006

Back of the Envelope Physics
There's a great post on well-tempered numbers at Zeroth Order Approximation:
In doing quick approximate calculations, you certainly do not want to do actual multiplication or long division. Heavens! So you take short-cuts and round things off pretty severely. But you want to round things off in a uniform and consistent way, to keep your errors under control. To do this, I find that I naturally begin using a well-tempered set of numbers.

The idea is to choose a set of numbers that are separated by equal ratios -- like the notes in the well-tempered scale. Instead of filling the space between 1 and 2 (one octave), though, you fill up the space between 1 and 10 (one decade). Basically, the numbers you pick are evenly spaced on the slide rule scale. How many "notes" should you have in your scale? Not too many, or the system will be cumbersome; not too few, or your calculations will be too approximate to be useful. The exact number of notes in a decade will be chosen so that the individual steps have very convenient, easy-to-remember values -- even if you have to cheat a little to get the right "harmonies".

This is why engineers, at least those working across many orders of magnitude, such as radar engineers, often use units of decibels. Of course, thinking this way tends to skew your thinking, especially when you look at a circuit and think, "Okay, it's only a 3 dB loss in power, so I'm okay." The problem is, 3 dB of loss means you've lost half the power.

Friday, January 20, 2006

France has nukes...
...and it's not afraid to use them. Three guesses whom Chirac's talking about:
France said on Thursday it would be ready to use nuclear weapons against any state that carried out a terrorist attack against it, reaffirming the need for its nuclear deterrent.
...
"The leaders of states who would use terrorist means against us, as well as those who would consider using in one way or another weapons of mass destruction, must understand that they would lay themselves open to a firm and adapted response on our part," Chirac said during a visit to a nuclear submarine base in northwestern France.

"This response could be a conventional one. It could also be of a different kind."

Chirac, who is commander-in-chief of the armed forces, said all of France's nuclear forces had been configured with the new strategy in mind and the number of nuclear warheads on French nuclear submarines had been reduced to allow targeted strikes.

It was the first time he had so clearly linked the threat of a nuclear response to a terrorist attack.

Chirac, 73, did not say whether France would be prepared to use pre-emptive strikes against a country it saw as a threat.

So is France willing to use force to protect a third party, such as Israel? Doubtful, but it's actually encouraging to see that some fire's left in France. (Hat tip to Clayton Cramer.)
God or Not Carnival thoughts
While hosting the God or Not Carnival, I of course had my own thoughts about the quality and nature of the arguments, but I was not allowed to comment on the posts themselves in the Carnival, and the manager of the Carnival asked me not to post any analysis in another blog entry until a few days after the carnival. To be honest, reading the entries was somewhat depressing, as very few of them, even among the "God" entries, agreed with my beliefs, and many of the posts were downright hostile, not merely argumentative. I will not attempt to go through the posts one by one, but there are a few arguments which I feel compelled to address. I am not interested in answering insult with insult, but I do need to explain and defend my own beliefs. Thus there are three arguments that I intend to address in the upcoming week:
  1. The first argument, made at the Evangelical Atheist, is that believers are inconsistent, in fact, intellectually dishonest, in believing some parts of the Bible to be literally true while believing that others are figurative. The Evangelical Atheist allows for the fact that some things are "literally figurative"--i.e., the text makes it clear they're figurative--but argues that this doesn't allow the Christian to regard the gospel stories as literal and the creation story in Genesis as figurative, as it's either all or nothing. He's correct that believers often choose literal vs. figurative as a matter of convenience, but he's taking an overly simplistic view of the Bible. There's more leeway than he allows.
  2. Theist Mathetes argues that sola scriptura religions are illogical, as they neither allow for any authority to interpret the scriptures nor do they allow for an authority which establishes the authority of the scriptures. I believe that he's misinterpreting what sola scriptura means, which I'll attempt to demonstrate.
  3. The final argument has little to do with scriptural literalism. It is instead the observation that the Bible contains a lot of bad stuff, and taking it seriously at all, whether literally or figuratively, requires belief in a God who is overtly evil. This was the view taken by The Uncredible Hallq, Kingdom of Heathen, and Skeptic Rant among the atheists, and Radical Goddess Thealogy among the theists. This is a serious objection to the God of the Bible and deserves a serious response, even if the hostility evinced in some of these posts seemed more designed to offend than to convince. I don't think God is evil, of course. I think our Western concepts of human worth and dignity would not exist without the influence of Christianity, so we would not even have the concepts by which we judge the God of the Bible without Him. I also think these bloggers are really making just a small part of a broader argument, the context of which I'll try to provide as I address their argument.

So that's what I intend to talk about in the upcoming week. Ambitious, isn't it? And dang, I need to get to work on revising Eyes of the Shadow some time soon. Well, I'll do my best.

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Jonah Goldberg on Iran
It seems that great minds do indeed think alike, and Jonah Goldberg has joined the anti-mullah party:
Iranians are a proud, nationalistic people and would probably rally around their government — or any government — were it threatened from without. That's one reason Ahmadinejad has been rattling his sabers so much lately: It's an attempt to bolster his unpopular regime.

A coup by sophisticated and serious members of the military would be great news. Even better would be a popular uprising. And best of all would be a combination of the two. An Iran with an old-style military dictatorship charged with defending democratic institutions would be an enormous, epochal victory for the West and for the Middle East. That would go a long way toward guaranteeing success in Iraq and would neutralize the threat of the Iran's nuclear ambitions, even if they decided to pursue a bomb. After all, the argument about nuclear weapons is no different than the argument about guns. The threat is from the people who have them, not from the weapons themselves. Lots of countries have nukes; we only need to worry about the ones run by whack jobs.

Alas, while there's reason to believe the White House shares this view in theory, there's less reason to believe it's doing that much about it in practice.

Let's do it.
Trip to Morocco
Doc Rampage continues to tell spine-tingling true tales of his trip to Morocco, although some of them are more Emotionally True than Factually True.

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Publishing progress
Good news! I received my first rejection today. Yes, I did say "good news" and "rejection," and yes, those two do go together. I expect to be getting a lot of rejections, and of course I'd rather get an acceptance, but a quick rejection means that I can quickly get the story submitted elsewhere. What's more, it was an encouraging rejection, with a personal note from the editor with some comments both praising the work and explaining why it didn't make the cut. Vaguely, in both cases, I admit, but such comments are not only helpful, they do a lot to set the response apart from all those dull form letters I usually get. Because of that, I'm likely to submit more stories to that publication, including things I probably wouldn't have considered submitting anywhere. In fact, because of his cordiality in the past (this isn't the first work of mine he's rejected), I dared to ask him if he'd look at another story of mine, even though it's longer than the usual length of stories his magazine accepts. He's agreed, and after some polishing and reformatting, I should have it ready to send via snail mail this weekend. At the least, I should get another polite rejection.

And yes, I am being vague, since these were private e-mail conversations and I don't want to post them for the world to see.

All in all, I've made three submissions thus far, and I intend to make two more by the end of the week, for a total of five this month. Once those go out, that's all the material I have that's submittable, at least until I get my next rejection, and it's time to start revising Eyes.
Mark Steyn on Iran
Mark Steyn proposes something I suggested a long time ago:
So what can be done? Right now, Iran can count on at least two Security Council vetoes against any meaningful action by the "international community". As for the unilaterally inclined, the difficulty for the US and Israel is that there's really no Osirak-type resolution of the problem - a quick surgical strike, in and out. By most counts, there are upwards of a couple of hundred potential sites spread across a wide range of diverse terrain, from remote mountain fastnesses to residential suburbs.
...
But, granted the Iranian destabilisation of Iraq and their sponsorship of terror groups in Lebanon and the Palestinian Authority, surely it shouldn't be difficult to give them a taste of their own medicine. Who, after all, likes the Teheran regime? The Russian and Chinese and North Korean governments and the fulsome Mr Straw appear to, but there's less evidence that the Iranian people do.

The majority of Iran's population is younger than the revolution: whether or not they're as "pro-American" as is sometimes claimed, they have no memory of the Shah; all they've ever known is their ramshackle Islamic republic where the unemployment rate is currently 25 per cent. If war breaks out, those surplus young men will be in uniform and defending their homeland.

Why not tap into their excess energy right now? As the foreign terrorists have demonstrated in Iraq, you don't need a lot of local support to give the impression (at least to Tariq Ali and John Pilger) of a popular insurgency. Would it not be feasible to turn the tables and upgrade Iran's somewhat lethargic dissidents into something a little livelier? A Teheran preoccupied by internal suppression will find it harder to pull off its pretensions to regional superpower status.

Back in Novermber of 2004, in a post on Bush's foreign agenda for his second term, I said:
Iran. Iran needs to be dealt with, and there isn't a whole lot of time to do it. The military option may be possible in two years, once things settle down in Iraq, but right now it'd be a stretch. Oh sure, we could bomb the living daylights out of them, that's easy, but if we could get regime change from a bombing campaign Saddam would've been gone in '91. My personal preference is direct and indirect support for the democratic movement in Iran. We already know that Iran is supporting the Islamist movement in Iraq, so I think we need to return the favor. Overt moral support and covert monetary and military support would be my preference. I don't know whether Bush is planning on doing this. So far it seems to be let the UN and the EU-3 do its thing, but we've seen how effective that is, and I think Bush will take a more proactive role. At the least, expect him to talk up the democratic movement in Iran.

I'm glad I'm not the only one to propose this.

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Politics
I haven't written much about politics in a while. I guess I just haven't been very interested. Essentially it's the same old arguments with the same old people saying the same old things. Maybe it will perk up around the November elections. I'll post on something I find interesting enough to discuss.
Storyblogging Carnival XXXVI is up
The latest Storyblogging Carnival, number thirty-six, is up at Doc Rampage. More carnivals can be found in the Storyblogging Carnival category.

The next Carnival whill be hosted here at Back of the Envelope on January 31st.

Monday, January 16, 2006

Weekly Webcomic Update
Sluggy Freelance — It's Bun-bun vs. Blacksoul, round n+1. His attempt to trick Calix into attacking Blacksoul doesn't work, as Calix has run off with Kada. Blacksoul is one of the few people that Bun-bun can't beat by brawn. Fortunately, he always has a plan B.

Day by Day — Sam, Zed, Jane, and Damon are all at a party for Hillary Clinton. Zed doesn't like the way Mr. Clinton looks at Sam, so he decks him. The secret service, and Hillary herself, are surprisingly accomodating.

Scary Go Round — It looks like I misunderstood last week. It wasn't Erin who got hypnotized, but Roxy, who's actually a much paler blond with longer hair who doesn't wear glasses like Erin--I really shouldn't have made that mistake, but then, I didn't remember Roxy at all. Anyway, this week everyone's wondering what's up with her.

College Roomies from Hell!!! — Mike invites the rest of the Roomies on Spring Break with him. Most of them are eager to come, but he has to do some arm-twisting just to get Dave to come, much less convince him to pretend to be his gay lover.

General Protection Fault — Fooker and Ki try to figure out what's happened to Nick, but they're going to have to do something about the wedding that's about to be postponed due to missing groom. Just as they're making plans, an alternate Trudy shows up.

Schlock Mercenary — Kevyn creates a very creepy AI, dumb when it comes to sentience but tactically brilliant, to run the ship. It's his way to keep the ship's AI from disobeying orders and getting itself blown up again. Meanwhile, Ennesby takes on a new role, adjutant, which works a lot like the role of gopher.


I may be adding a new comic to be added to the Weekly Webcomic Update soon. We'll see.
God or Not Carnival: "Scriptural Literalism"
This week, Back of the Envelope is hosting the God or Not Carnival on the topic of Scriptural Literalism. As host, I'm not allowed to talk about my own opinions on this topic, or judge the submissions others have made, within the carnival. I'll do my best simply to summarize the arguments presented. I couldn't decide on a good organization, so I ultimately divided it between the "God" posts and the "Not" posts. Since Back of the Envelope is a "God" blog, I'll put the "Not" posts first.

Not

In "Scriptural Literalism," Breakerslion of Confusion of Ideas argues that since the internal contradictions make it impossible for a reasonable person to believe that the Bible is literally true, that the assertion that it is is really a litmus test to determine whether the religious follower will believe anything.

Chris Hallquist at The Uncredible Hallq offers a post called "Scriptural literalism is not the issue," where he says that it doesn't matter whether the Bible is literally true or not, that the character of the God described in the Bible is unworthy of worship should he exist at all.

I Am at The Evangelical Atheist offers us "Cherry-Picking (Not Literally)," saying that while it's consistent to argue that the Bible is figurative or that it is literal, it is intellectually dishonest to argue that some portions are literal while others are not except in the case of portions that are "literally figurative," which are clearly presented as figurative in the text.

Seth at the Kingdom of Heathen argues in "Fetch the Book of Armaments!" that those who don't take the Bible literally, yet look to it as a source of morals, are deluding themselves, as the Bible's "not a stable source of morals. It is inconsistent, vague, and downright outrageous."

In "Scriptural Literalism: the Patriarchal Divide," Reluctant Atheist of Bibliblography presents us with the argument that scriptural literalism is more a male phenomenon, due to the way that men think.

LBBP of Skeptic Rant presents "Scriptural Literalism," wherein he takes the view that if anyone truly took the Bible literally, it would require behavior which is far from acceptable to our society.

Francois Tremblay of Goosing the Antithesis submits his post "Applying induction to the 'holey' writ," using inductive reasoning to argue that it's absurd to select a single book as infallible.

God

Dwight Welch at the Religious Liberal Blog has a post called "embracing history," where he argues that no one is takes the Bible completely literally, and that those studying it need to first understand the historical context, and then interpret it through the lens of what Jesus said were the two greatest commandments: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind." and "You shall love your neighbor as yourself."

Trey at Daddy, Papa and Me presents the "Greatest Commandments," which takes a position identical to Dwight, that the Bible needs to be interpreted according to the Two Greatest Commandments. He does emphasize the last part of what Jesus said, that "All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments."

At Rev. Bill, the Reverend argues in "About Pat" that people such as Pat Robertson, using a literal interpretation of the Bible in order to try to explain current events miss the larger message of the Bible.

In "Bible: Literal or Figurative?", Brendan McPhillips at BrendanMcPhillips.com, takes a purely figurative view of the Bible and the stories of Creation, the Flood, and the Resurrection.

Chad at Eternal Revolution gives us "Pitfalls of Literal Interpretation," where he claims that it is possible to accept a metaphorical interpretation of many passages in the Bible without diluting or refuting their meaning.

In "On Scriptural Literalism," Jim Jordan at the Moral Science Club takes the view that the scriptures are infallible, in that they do not fail us, but they are not literal. This is a very long post.

Anne Johnson at The Gods are Bored gives us "Evidence for the Defense #4", a humorous story where Satan gives his version of what happened during Jesus's temptation in the wilderness.

Kristopher at Mathetes has a post titled "Interpretation," which says that sola scriptura, the view that scripture is the only source of authority, is illogical, as it does not acknowledge an authority for interpreting the scripture, and as it lacks a source to confirm the authority of the scriptures themselves.

Macht at Prosthesis, gives us "The Chimera of Biblical Literalism," where he argues that literalism and inerrancy are not the same thing, and that no one who believes in the Bible is a strict Biblical literalist.

Athana at Radical Goddess Thealogy sends "ERZEBET Dug HER OWN GRAVE — LITERALLY," where she uses the example of Fred Phelps to show the dangers of taking the Bible literally, but then goes on to argue that it doesn't matter if you take it literally or figuratively, the scriptures of the warrior god, whether Jewish, Christian, or Muslim, are so dangerous that they ought to be banned entirely as Weapons of Mass Destruction.



That's it, all the entries this time. As you can see, I didn't get a single post supporting the literal interpretation of the Bible, excepting those saying that the literal interpretation was reason to reject it.

Let me know if you see any problems with this post.

The next GOD or NOT Carnival, number seven, is on January 30th at The Uncredible Hallq, and the topic is "Definition of God."

Update: I added one last post, where I was late getting the necessary information. It was mostly my fault as I think I hit the wrong button and saved the e-mail with the info request rather than sending it.